Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Ramada Inn by Wyndham
as 1:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Ramada Inn by Wyndham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Ramada Inn by Wyndham
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Ramada Inn by Wyndham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Troy Lewis
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government , Louisville Metro Department of Corrections , Allan Fugate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Audubon Loans I, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Audubon Loans I, LLC , Robert R. Brantley , Benjamin W. Perry, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. Ramada Inn
as 3:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Ray Hester
Defendant:
Ramada Inn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips et al v. Ramada Inn of Zanesville et al
as 2:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Chris Phillips and Jonathan Taylor
Defendant:
Ramada Inn of Zanesville, Ramada Hotel & Conference Center and Zanesville LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ramada Worldwide Incorporated v. Clinton Commercial Development, LLC
as 2:2012mc50531
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Incorporated
Defendant:
Clinton Commercial Development, LLC
Ramada Worldwide, Inc. v. Clinton Commercial Development, LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00056
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Clinton Commercial Development, LLC, Angelo Jones and Arnel Bolden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
