Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5341
Plaintiff:
CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, REGGIE EDGE, JR., in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol and CHARLES ACHINGER, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol
Lay v. Swanson et al
as 4:2024cv10723
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent:
Christopher Swanson and David S. Leyton
Beach v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04274
Plaintiff:
Reggie Beach
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv12563
Plaintiff:
Reggie Jackson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrick v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation Individually, and d/b/a Burlington Coat Factory #1222
as 2:2023cv02597
Plaintiff:
Reggie Carrick
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation Individually doing business as Burlington Coat factory # 1222
Hmoud, et al v. City Of Cincinnati, et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ahmad hmoud and Liberty Used Tires, LLC
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Emily Smart Woerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eastep v. City of Nashville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Chelesy Eastep
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Tennessee, Brian Murphy, Steven Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
