Cases 1 - 10 of 285
Rose v. Smithers
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Rose
Defendant:
Smithers a foreign limited liability corporation doing business as The Smithers Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Rose Nevada Inc., Trustee of the Jonathan Rose Exempt Trust II et al
as 2:2024cv10816
Defendant:
Rose Nevada Inc., Trustee of the Jonathan Rose Exempt Trust II and Jonathan Rose Distribution Trust
Rose Nevada, Inc. v. Audrey Homes, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2024cv10818
Plaintiff:
Rose Nevada, Inc.
Defendant:
Audrey Homes, L.L.C., Edward Rose Village Apartments, L.L.C., Edward Rose Building Company, L.L.C. and others
Brower v. Roose et al
as 2:2024cv10702
Plaintiff:
Malcom Brower and Mariah Godfrey
Defendant:
Erica Roose, Edward Rose Village Apartments, LLC Doing business as Charter Oaks Apartments and Edward Rose Associates, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson et al v. Thornton et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson, Thompson Properties, LLC, United Builders, LLC and others
Defendant:
Rose Thornton, Michelle Signor, Nicholas Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff:
Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
United States of America v. U.S Currency $25,760.00
as 2:2023cv13037
Plaintiff:
United States of America and U.S Currency $25,760.00; and 18K Rose Gold Rolex-Day Date 40, Model 218235 Watch,
Defendant:
U.S Currency $25,760.00 and 18K Rose Gold Rolex-Day Date 40, Model 218235 Watch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Smith v. Madery et al
as 2:2023cv12703
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Defendant:
Brian Madery, D. Brassfield, Jennifer Norder and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
