Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Nessel v. The Wine Store of Marlborough Inc
as 2:2024cv12175
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan
Defendant:
The Wine Store of Marlborough Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Crawford et al v. McKinley et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite, Alton Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., The United States Congress, The United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lopez v. Benson et al
as 2:2024cv10916
Plaintiff:
Sotero Montellano Lopez, III
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson, Martin J. O'Malley, Janet Yellen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clifford Frost, Jr. v. Dana Nessel
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JAMES FROST, JR.
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan; in official capacity
Young v. Corrigan
as 2:2023cv12833
Petitioner:
Charles Frazier Young
Respondent:
James Corrigan and Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Fralix v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Carey Fralix
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LP, et al
as 23-1671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP, ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Curtis v. Christianson
as 4:2023cv11391
Petitioner:
Ra'Sean Curtis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Michigan and John Christiansen
Bowles v. Sabree et al
as 2:2023cv10973
Plaintiff:
Tonya Bowles, Norman Jr. Poydras, V&V Taylor Distributing, LLC and others
Defendant:
Eric R. Sabree and Wayne, County of
Intervenor:
Attorney General for the State of Michigan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
