Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Teague v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02701
Plaintiff:
Timothy Teague
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graves v. Teague
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Graves
Defendant:
Teague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Teague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03305
Plaintiff:
Michael Teague
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teague v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
Justin Teague
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Commissioners, Captain Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez Perry v. Warden, Warren Correctional, et al
as 23-3517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUEZ B. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER DANIEL BURKE, SERGEANT JAMIE EWEN, UMC RODNEY MCINTOSH and others
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARREN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Teague v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00084
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
George Teague
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Teague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Bette Teague
Defendant:
C R BARD, Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teague v. Bayer-Bayer eT, AL.
as 3:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
JaRon Shawn La'V Teague
Defendant:
Bayer-Bayer eT, AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Teague, Jr. v. Genesee County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2022cv10255
Petitioner:
Larry Teague, Jr.
Respondent:
Genesee County Sheriff Office and Christopher Swanson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
