Cases 1 - 10 of 290
Pondexter v. United Parcel Service
as 2:2024cv02399
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pondexter
Defendant:
United Parcel Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Malcolm Dillon, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Lori Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Boyd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Boyd
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Manning v. Bloodworth et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Darcye Manning
Defendant:
Glenn Bloodworth and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jean-Guerrier v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Rony Jean-Guerrier
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Kirk Patrick Egan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
DUNLAP v. Peale et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
NIKIA DUNLAP
Defendant:
PEALE HALSTON, RONALD BARRETT, United Parcel Service (UPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
