Cases 1 - 10 of 782
The Ali Arkan El Siblani Trust v. Jamkin Consulting, Inc et al
as 5:2024cv11481
Plaintiff:
The Ali Arkan El Siblani Trust
Defendant:
Jamkin Consulting, Inc Doing business as Truth Lounge, Reginald Sapp and Rupert Grant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Bolog et al. v. El-Gharib et al.
as 5:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Bolog and U.S. Coach Sales & Leasing, Ltd.
Defendant:
Wissam Zaki El-Gharib, Adnan Mahmood, Shahid Latif and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Smith-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv11370
Plaintiff:
Sheik D. Smith-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dana Nessel, Detroit Land Bank Authority and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. El Sol Azteca, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
El Sol Azteca, LLC doing business as El Sol Azteca and Wilfrido Tovar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
General Sessions Court of Davidson County, et al v. El
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
General Sessions Court of Davidson County and Teresah M. Pinho
Defendant:
Koree Brooks El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
