Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Michael Waddell v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5971
Respondent:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WADDELL
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1702
Defendant:
T. COBBS, Grievance Coordinator, JEFFREY WHITE, Former Assistant Deputy Warden, DOCTOR FRACIES and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER and JASON ALAN TYRRELL
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waddell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03735
Plaintiff:
Glenn Waddell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waddell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03471
Plaintiff:
Toney Waddell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ward v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Roger Ward
Defendant:
Kerry Ross, Brett Hinsch, Randy Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss, et. al. v. Anderson County Government et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Defendant:
Anderson County Government, Corporal Christopher Conner, Mayor City of Jellico, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Moss and Alexandria White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Waddell, Jr. v. Greeneville, TN Police Department, et al
as 23-5215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD RICHARD WADDELL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENEVILLE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW STANLEY, Officer, ERIC SCOTT, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
