Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Crawford #560561 v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2020cv00256
Defendant:
G. Jack, Darryl Cross, George Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Seanderyl Crawford #560561
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgis #566328 v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Unknown Zellar, Unknown McIntire and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis #566328
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Sturgis v. Unknown Suardini, et al
as 16-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD STURGIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER UNKNOWN SUARDINI, UNKNOWN ZELLAR, CO Sgt, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, Warden, named as Cathryn Bouman and others
Sturgis #566328 v. Suardini et al
as 2:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis #566328
Defendant:
Unknown Suardini, Unknown Zellar, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgis v. Suardini et al
as 2:2016cv10738
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis
Defendant:
Suardini, Zellar, Cathryn Bouman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zellar v. Thesis Chemistry, LLC
as 2:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Stanley Edward Zellar, Sr.
Defendant:
Thesis Chemistry, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Porter v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2013cv00923
Plaintiff:
Antwain Rashawn Porter
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
