Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Hines et al v. Michigan High School Athletic Association et al
as 4:2023cv10381
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hines, Mark Savoury and Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Michigan High School Athletic Association and Vic Michaels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dumas v. Albaier et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
2141218 Alberta LTD d/b/a Splendour Trucking LTD., Barr-Nunn Transportation, LLC, Brandon Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Dumas
Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union No. 860 et al v. Cleveland Heights, Ohio
as 1:2019cv01136
Plaintiff:
Frank Peyser, Joseph Cardarella, Joe Gantous and others
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Frank Coniglio, Jr., et al v. Chesapeake Exploration. L.L.C, et al
as 15-4044
Plaintiff:
FRANK CONIGLIO, JR. and JOSEPH CONIGLIO
Interested Party - Appellant:
TZANGAS, PLAKAS & MANNOS, LTD., LEE E. PLAKAS, GARY A. CORROTO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION. L.L.C.
Defendant:
C B C SERVICES, INC., BRANDON WILLIAMS and CHK UTICA, L.L.C.
Coniglio et al v. C B C Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01773
Defendant:
C B C Services, Inc. and Brandon Williams
Plaintiff:
Frank Coniglio, Jr. and Joseph Coniglio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. Assurant Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams, Rebecca Williams and Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Assurant Inc. and Union Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
