Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02337
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02751
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Unique Designs, Inc. v. Signet Jewelers Ltd. et al.
as 5:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Unique Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Signet Jewelers Ltd., Strlji Inc. doing business as Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Strlji Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Sterling Jewelers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02471
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02465
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Boehne et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mary Joan Boehne, David L. Hahn and Amy M. Ross
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., Walmart Inc, Unique Freight Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Sims v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12992
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Unique Sims
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Tyler Scott Alene, Janelle Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Unique Brooks
as 22-6006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNIQUE BROOKS
Carson v. Rottmann et al
as 2:2022cv12645
Plaintiff:
Franco Carson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rottmann and Unique Clips LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
