Cases 61 - 70 of 426
Washington v. Supervalu Inc
as 2:2019cv02211
Plaintiff:
Darnell Washington
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lundeen v. GC Services, LP
as 1:2019cv01259
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lundeen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gentlemen Gaming, LTD v. East Peoria, City of et al
as 1:2019cv01240
Plaintiff:
Gentlemen Gaming, LTD
Defendant:
Ty Livingston, East Peoria, City of, East Peoria ZBA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bray v. Lathem Time Co.,
as 3:2019cv03157
Plaintiff:
Bret Bray
Defendant:
Lathem Time Co.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Western Illinois Service Coordination et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2019cv03127
Defendant:
Melissa Wright, Gary Kramer, Grace B. Hou and others
Plaintiff:
Western Illinois Service Coordination, F.L., Central Illinois Service Access and others
Intervenor:
Service Inc of Illinois, Prairieland Service Coordination Inc and Service of Will Grundy and Kankakee Counties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 4:2019cv04043
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Lallouz v. Faingold
as 3:2019cv03053
Plaintiff:
Ariella Lallouz
Defendant:
Charles Faingold
Respondent:
Baruch Faingold
Interested Party:
E.F.
Petitioner:
Ariella Faingold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CGB Diversified Services, Inc. v. Froehling
as 3:2019cv03034
Plaintiff:
CGB Diversified Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Arthur H. Froehling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Professional Leasing Services
as 1:2019cv01009
Plaintiff:
Educational Credit Management Corporation
Defendant:
Professional Leasing Services
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Horne v. Lafriniere et al
as 4:2019cv04002
Petitioner:
Gerald T. Horne
Respondent:
Christopher Lafriniere, Stephen Kijanowski and Zachary Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
