Cases 61 - 70 of 2,061
TURNER v. REGAL et al
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
SPENCER TURNER
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, MARK SEVIER, J. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASTERDAY v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
MISTY EASTERDAY
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC, LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER, UNKNOWN QCC EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. GRAY et al
as 1:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
J. GRAY, M. PFLEEGER, M SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. WARRICK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH N. BROWN and TRAVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARRICK COUNTY JAIL, HOLDER and GABE KIPFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. HENDRIX
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. TURNER
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONNIE L. PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TOMPKINS v. REAGEL et al
as 1:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
LANDON TOMPKINS
Defendant:
REAGEL, MATHEMA, KOENIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. BOONE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
ANDREA WHITE
Defendant:
BOONE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
