Cases 51 - 60 of 353
LANGSTON KISER v. GLADIEUX et al
as 1:2022cv02206
Plaintiff:
ADAM KEITH LANGSTON KISER
Defendant:
DAVID GLADIEUX, ALLEN COUNTY CONFINEMENT STAFF, QUALITY CARE CONTROL MED SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. AUTOZONE INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant:
AUTOZONE INC. and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HARDIN v. BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE HARDIN
Defendant:
BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT., CHIEF MICHAEL DIEKHOFF, DET. JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF INDIANA IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
OSCAR K. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA IDOC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURSE v. BAPTISE et al
as 1:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
MACKENZIE COREY BURKE and MACKENZIE COREY BURSE
Defendant:
BAPTISE, SINGH, ROMELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. WIDENER et al
as 1:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E. WELLS, JR.
Defendant:
BRANDY WIDENER, PENNY EDEN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00322
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, VANIHEL, NURSE COAKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 1-8 v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1-8
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DAVID LOWE, Unknown Jail Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
