Cases 61 - 70 of 1,364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCUTERI v. LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, KYLE ASKREN, DANVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWLAND v. JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv02359
Plaintiff:
ANDREW EVAN HOWLAND
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEN v. COFFEE et al
as 2:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
COFFEE and GIRDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUTCHER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv02407
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DUTCHER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BILBY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BILBY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DALE FARIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, KATHY COWAN and TORI JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
FITZGERALD v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
ANDREW B. FITZGERALD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
