Cases 121 - 130 of 101,694
SMALL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMALL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCRANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCRANTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Howarter
as 1:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
Justin Howarter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
Candie Brown and Stefanie Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schmidt, . Jumper, . Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Plaintiff:
William Byron Benedict
Defendant:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Gaughan
as 3:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Quinyatte J. Harrell
Defendant:
James P. Gaughan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
