Cases 71 - 80 of 792
Hill v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Lydell Hill
Defendant:
Warden, Lewis, Doughby and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Elizabeth W. Canelas, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04079
Plaintiff:
Demeco Hill
Defendant:
Michael Williams, Tyrone Baker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Hill
as 3:2023cv01722
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Kathy S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobs v. Strobel et al
as 1:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Collins L Jacobs
Defendant:
K Strobel, Yana Pusich, P Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FALICE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. FALICE
Defendant:
J. SMITH, J. STARRICK, J. YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jeremiah Hill v. Todd Schloendorf, et al
as 23-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH V. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD SCHLOENDORF, Sergeant, CRYSTAL KRUMWIEDE, Correctional Officer, SONJA HANDSON, Correctional Officer and others
Wagner v. Zenn et al
as 3:2023cv50145
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Wagner and Scanning Dixon
Defendant:
Dr. Zenn, John/Jane Does, Wexford Health Source Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Hill v. Nicholas Henshaw
as 23-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH V. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS HENSHAW, Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
