Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Titus Henderson v. Matthew Frank, et al
as 24-1756
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW FRANK, JONNI SHANNON-SHARPE, SARA MASON and others
Titus Henderson v. Edward Wall, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD WALL, GARY BOUGHTON, SARA MASON and others
Attaway v. David et al
as 3:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Alexandria Brown and Ashley Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP et al v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
Defendant:
REINHARDT, CHRISTINA CONYERS, IRENE O. IGLIONOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Luster et al
as 4:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Luster et al
as 1:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
ANGELA BAKER, KEVIN DEW, RICHARD WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Downing et al
as 2:2021cv02212
Plaintiff:
Leonard Sharp
Defendant:
. Downing, Jim Rowe, Darlisha Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sleeper v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03904
Plaintiff:
Shane Sleeper
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Stateville Correctional, Dixon Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
