Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Brown v. Leutz et al
as 3:2024cv03096
Plaintiff:
Cassius Brown
Defendant:
Darr Leutz, Brittany Greene, Zorian Trusewych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashum v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bashum
Defendant:
Keenan M Smith, Brittany Greene, Kimberly Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fonville v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Michael Fonville
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens and Tracy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. LaShelle et al
as 4:2022cv04182
Plaintiff:
Everett Bowen
Defendant:
Bryan LaShelle and Ashley Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP SR
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF INDIANA IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
OSCAR K. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA IDOC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
ADULT DETENTION CENTER, C.O SAUERS, WELLPATH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
BOWEN, HAMBLEM, STOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Powell v. Charles Bowen, et al
as 22-2460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE V. POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BOWEN and CRISTINA STOBAUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
