Cases 181 - 190 of 2,859
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Apple Inc. v. ITC
as 24-1285
Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
MASIMO CORPORATION and CERCACOR LABORATORIES, INC.
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 24-1289
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Appellee:
APPLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 24-1278
Appellant:
CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.
Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Leonard v. United States of America
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Biden Administration, President JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., U.S. PRESIDENT, AKA Joseph A. Biden, AKA Joseph Robinette Biden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Athena Reddersen v. The United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Athena Reddersen
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-1861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Jaiyeola v. AT&T et al
as 5:2023cv05182
Plaintiff:
Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola
Defendant:
AT&T, T-Mobile US, Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 23-4027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Ph.D., MBA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
