Cases 11 - 20 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOYCE v. ROY et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
LUCRETIA M. JOYCE
Defendant:
BJ ROY, BILL FLUTY, CANDANCE NANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hoeller v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Hoeller
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Judge F Laura Lau, Judge Lloyd V Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nashaat Daoud v. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr.
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
NASHAAT DAOUD
Defendant:
GEN. KENNETH F. MCKENZIE JR., in his official capacity as Commander of the United States Central Command, LLOYD JAMES AUSTIN III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, United States of America, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ELDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
LLOYD TIMOTHY ELDER, SR
Defendant:
JUDGE SHERRY GREGG GILMORE and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05088
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Newman
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
