Cases 61 - 70 of 162
Stowe, Graham v. Van Rybroek, Gregory et al
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Graham L. Stowe
Defendant:
Gregory Van Rybroek , Mel Christiansen, Melissa Plumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Norris v. Otto Serrato, et al
as 18-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN V. NORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
OTTO SERRATO, Joliet Police Officers, #169, JOHN WILLIAMS, #121, ROBERT HALL, #83 and others
GRAHAM v. CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAUARANTS, INC.
as 1:2017cv04712
Defendant:
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAUARANTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEITH S GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Knox v. Kuhnmuench et al
as 2:2017cv01637
Plaintiff:
Alexia Knox
Defendant:
Mary Kuhnmuench, Joseph Donald, Marshall B Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
McDaniel et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Brandon McDaniel , Amy Cox and Estate of S.M., Minor
Defendant:
Alyssa Graham, Zack Teague and Dena Krigbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatch v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 1:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo L Hatch
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services, Chrystal Graham, Jennifer Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
