Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Griffin v. West Allis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00693
Defendant:
West Allis Police Officer Jacobson, West Allis Police Officer Lehman, West Allis Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Cherakei Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed, Laera v. Ourada, John et al
as 3:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Laera Denise Reed
Defendant:
John Ourada , Paul Westerhaus , Wayne S. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA et al v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD et al
as 1:2017cv01388
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA, DORIS A MCDOUGAL, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant:
MYRA A ELDRIDGE, MAURA HOFF, KEITH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoff v. City of Evanston et al
as 1:2017cv03058
Plaintiff:
Heidi Hoff
Defendant:
City of Evanston , Alice Ward , Dagmara Koste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. City of Carlinville et al
as 3:2013cv03365
Plaintiff:
Henry J Johnston
Defendant:
City of Carlinville, Aaron Key, Clay Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2013cv00200
Defendant:
SARAH EVANS BARKER, GERALD BEPKO, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Defendant:
AARON-RUBEN-NELSON MORTUARY, MARY MORIARTY ADAMS, AFNI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
David Williams v. Michael Grebner, et al
as 08-1926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L.A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GREBNER, MEDICAL FEDERATION, CHARLES FITZGERALD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
