Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Houston v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Larry Houston
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Frank Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hobbs v. Shesky et al
as 2:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Rusten Shesky, Kathrine Sparks-Shesky, Fred R. Holzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hobbs v. Shesky et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Rusten Shesky, Daniel G Miskinis, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobbs v. Willis et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Nicholas Willis, Alejandro Padilla, Tim Zarzecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobbs v. Bauch et al
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Reva S Bauch, Charles R Vaith, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
AVILA et al v. HOPPES et al
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
BONIFACIO AVILA and HOLLY AVILA
Defendant:
KELSEY HOPPES, LAURA HOUSTON and JAYDA MONTEIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Houston v. Village of Calumet Park, et al
as 19-3387
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF SOUTH HOLLAND, CITY OF BLUE ISLAND, VILLAGE OF BURNHAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA HOUSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
