Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Oneal et al v. East Chicago City of et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Defendant:
John Does I-X, Mitchell Tipton, East Chicago City of and others
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Oneal, Laquan Afolayan and Craig Ginn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper et al v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Defendant:
john does I-X and Oscar Martinez, Jr
Plaintiff:
torrey allen, israel stokes, skarlett cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
BROOKIE R. MORRISON and REDEVELOPMENT REVITALIZATION OF THE SOUTHSIDE CDC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Temores v. City of Hammond et al
as 2:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Antonio Temores
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Chief of Police William Short, Officer D A Hornyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe I et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv06486
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, John Thuet, District 14 of CPS Schools and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler v. Staes et al
as 4:2020cv04007
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jack Asquini, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jaylan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv02033
Defendant:
John Doe, II, Tony Brasel, . Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Mario J Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delices v. Board of Regents et al
as 2:2018cv01839
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delices
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe II, Johannes Britz, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jane Doe, et al v. Shawn Loomi
as 18-2052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, I - IV and JOHN DOE, I and II
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN LOOMIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
