Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COLLINS v. MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA SCOTT COLLINS
Defendant:
PHELAN MONTGOMERY, ANN SMITH MISCHLER and CLARK COTTOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JANE HANKINS and DAVID JAMES ROACH
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, SHERRI BENTLY, TROY TARPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00823
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY CO. SHERIFF'S OFF., MONTGOMERY COUNTY and MONTGOMERY CO. POLICE DPT.
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv03076
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPT. and MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA, ET AL
as 1:2020cv00941
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, INDIANA MONTGOMERY COUNTY, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
