Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Neumann v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.
as 1:2023cv16100
Plaintiff:
Isabella Neumann
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Eric Rucker v. Eric Severson, et al
as 23-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC T. RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON, LIEUTENANT SHALLOW, JAMES MATTHEWS and others
Rucker v. Waukesha County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Eric T Rucker
Defendant:
Waukesha County Jail, Sheriff Eric J Severson, Lt Shallow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEUMANN v. CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
KYLE NEUMANN
Defendant:
MAVERICK RASTAKHIZ, CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JON HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowald, Rebecca et al v. Columbia County et al
as 3:2018cv00582
Defendant:
Jason Stenberg, Kathryn E. Miller, Peter Waring and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Thom, William Cadwallader, John Gruber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thom, David et al v. Garrigan, Daniel et al
as 3:2018cv00368
Plaintiff:
David Thom, Crystel Thom, William Cadwallader and others
Defendant:
Daniel Garrigan , Charles Poches , Matthew Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neumann v. Village of Pocahontas, Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Steven Neumann
Defendant:
Village of Pocahontas, Illinois, Michael Lantrip, Jane Lantrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
