Cases 131 - 140 of 335
MITCHELL v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02040
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., JOHN MITCHEFF, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2020cv02003
Plaintiff:
OTIS CARR
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, IDNIANA STATE NOTARY PUBLIC, LIONAL GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Wexford Medical Staff et al
as 3:2020cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Wexford Medical Staff, Susanna Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUY v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv01169
Plaintiff:
DANTE GUY and DANTE D. GUY
Defendant:
JANE DOE, RICHARD BROWN, OFFICER #1 JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Jane Doe, J Smiley, Margie Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Schrock, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohnes v. Arredondo et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Hon. Lorenzo Arredondo, Deputy Clerk Wanda Gary and Deputy Clerk Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv05059
Defendant:
JANE DOE, D. TOMAW, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Richard Brown, John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2019cv00260
Defendant:
JANE DOE, BOOTS and DAVE WEDDING
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00239
Defendant:
SNEELING, NEWBY, 3 WORKERS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
