Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Cruz III v. Evanston Illinois Law Enforcement Supervisor et al
as 1:2023cv03060
Plaintiff:
Luis G Cruz III
Defendant:
Evanston Illinois Law Enforcement Supervisor, Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cintron, Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engle v. Knox County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv04072
Petitioner:
Shane Ray Engle
Respondent:
Knox County Sheriff, Louis Glossip, Brad Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberto Cruz-Rivera v. USA
as 23-1791
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roberto Cruz-Rivera v. USA
as 23-1747
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNSER v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LEE UNSER
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Cruz-Rivera v. USA
as 23-1455
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRUZ-RIVERA
as 1:2023cv00404
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grant v. Krolikowski et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Drevon Andrew Grant
Defendant:
Sgt Krolikowski, Unit Manager Heidt, Lt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Brown County Jail and Juvenile Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Cory A Cruz
Defendant:
Brown County Jail and Juvenile Detention Center and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
