Cases 21 - 30 of 1,117
Phillips v. Strack et al
as 1:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Daina Strack, Ben Slocum, Jason Edgecomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Slater et al
as 1:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Santez Johnson
Defendant:
R. Slater and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bone v. McConky et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Adam Lynn Bone
Defendant:
Matt McConky, Ronnie Stevens, Steve Coody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stechauner, Matthew v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Stechauner
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Kevin Carr, Leigha Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Recla, Adam v. Curtis, Jeremiah et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adam Recla
Defendant:
Jeremiah Curtis, Derrick June and Adam Marciulionis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
