Cases 41 - 50 of 197
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv04065
Defendant:
ESKENAZI HEALTH, ADKINS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shah El v. Josh et al
as 3:2019cv50123
Defendant:
Maureen Josh, Phillip Montgomery, Ronald Matekaits and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin v. Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv03280
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department, Erin Mattson, Montgomery County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv02028
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail/Sheriff's Department, Erin Mattson, Montgomery County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv00434
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murray v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2018cv02234
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Victor Colloway, Kelly Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50306
Defendant:
J. Maher, Lucern, S. Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50301
Defendant:
J. Maher, S. Joiner, Rochelle Briney and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv01463
Defendant:
K. Wilson, Stone, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery v. Steenrod et al
as 2:2018cv00991
Defendant:
Stephen Mueller, Scott Keland, Christopher Steenrod and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
