Cases 51 - 60 of 363
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
BENNITO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Luis Rodriguez v. D. Hudson, et al
as 22-2654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HUDSON, D. HOLDRICH-CROOKS, J. CRUZE and others
Rodriguez v. Anastacio
as 1:2022cv04245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, D. Gomez, Sgt. Anastacio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Rodriguez
as 1:2022cv04024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Fontaine Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Burt-Brazziel v. Glaze et al
as 2:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Howard Elwon Burt-Brazziel
Defendant:
Glaze, Simmons, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS, BARNETT, RODRIGUEZ, WRIGHT, AYON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
TERELL OWENS, CAMEUS BARNETT, THADDEUS RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50187
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
T. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
RODRIGUEZ v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
LUIS F. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DR. DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
John Gilliam
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, City Of Chicago, K. Pilch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02349
Plaintiff:
Lamar Baker
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and J Iz Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
