Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff: Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant: City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Cockerell, III v. Mike Conyers, et al
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant: BOBBY B. COCKERELL, III
Defendant / Appellee: MIKE CONYERS, Major, JERRY GILLEY, Capt, CURTIS BYNUM, Lieutenant, Lt and others
Bynum v. Task Force We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02748
Plaintiff: Darryl R Bynum
Defendant: Task Force and St Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. IDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01929
Defendant: A. DEWAR, IDOC, C. BYNUM and others
Plaintiff: RAFAEL ROSA, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. ZATECKY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01734
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, JASON ERNEST and others
Plaintiff: DAVID HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03866
Defendant: PAUL A. TALBOT, DUSHAN ZETACY, WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS LEMONT HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03615
Plaintiff: RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant: DR. PAUL A. TALBOT and CURTIS BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. TALBOT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03519
Plaintiff: RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant: CURTIS BYNUM and PAUL TALBOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. SPANGLER et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Defendant: C. BYNUM, K. CLARK, E. HAMMOND and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WOODS
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. Brian
as 2:2018cv00289
Plaintiff: Johnny Bynum
Defendant: Agent Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?