Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Albert Jones v. William Hyatte, et al
as 24-1591
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, former Warden of Miami Correctional Facility; in his official capacity and BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden of Miami Correctional Facility; in his official capacity
Jackson v. Henderson et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
. Henderson, John Marter, Nicholas C Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
TROY L. SMTH and TROY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, HOLLY DENMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fort v. People Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50262
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Isiah Fort
Defendant:
People Of The State Of Illinois, C. Jones, Troy Hadie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Albert Jones and Albert C Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
as 2:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo C Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HANNLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. JONES
Defendant:
AMY HANNLEY, CRAIG CANNIFF, KENNETH STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMPTON v. GEO, CORP. et al
as 1:2021cv02025
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Defendant:
GEO, CORP., TORRES, C. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERSON v. ISAACS et al
as 1:2020cv02445
Defendant:
MELISSA K. ISAACS and C. JONES
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH ROBERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Scott et al
as 4:2020cv04147
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, D Mercher, Gregg Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
