Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THOMPSON v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, KEYES, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services,, et al
as 21-3360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP and others
Perry et al. v. Heisner et al
as 1:2020cv07502
Defendant:
T. Miller, T. Holt-Nicholson, MacDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez, John Thompson, Fernando Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. ARAMARK CORPORATION FOOD SERVICES PROVIDER et al
as 1:2019cv02374
Defendant:
MICHAEL CONYERS, ARAMARK CORPORATION FOOD SERVICES PROVIDER, DUANE ALSIP and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McInnes v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv01119
Plaintiff:
Travis John McInnes
Defendant:
John Thompson, . Butler, J Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Thompson et al
as 1:2013cv01133
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Moss
Defendant:
John Thompson, . Egan, . Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koch v. Gregory et al
as 3:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Koch
Defendant:
Katherine Gregory, Steve Sarris, Mark E Schutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koch v. Gregory et al
as 3:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Koch
Defendant:
Katherine Gregory, Steve Sarris, Mark Schutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiserman v. Thompson et al
as 1:2008cv01329
Plaintiff:
Michael A Heiserman
Defendant:
John Thompson, Chad A Hall, . Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jeremy Aron Lage, et al v. John Thompson
as 1:2008cv01293
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Aron Lage, Terry Wilson, Ronald Hotchkiss and others
Defendant:
John Thompson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
