Cases 101 - 110 of 12,620
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardimon v. Thielan et al
as 3:2024cv50157
Plaintiff:
Harrison J Hardimon
Defendant:
Nurse Thielan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mannie v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50160
Plaintiff:
Markus Mannie
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack, Jacob J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Sistrunk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Risper v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Broderick Risper
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittney Greene, Brandon Llewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welborn v. Truitt et al
as 1:2024cv03165
Plaintiff:
Francine Welborn
Defendant:
Charles Truitt and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
