Cases 101 - 110 of 157
McDowell v. Diaz et al
as 1:2013cv03615
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDowell
Defendant:
Officer Diaz, O'Mackey and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell et al v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2013cv03410
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDowell
Defendant:
Garry F McCarthy, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv03375
Plaintiff:
Antonio McDowell
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Dr. Funk, Dr. Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02380
Plaintiff:
Shawndell J. McDowell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
USA v. Steven McDowell
as 13-1524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN T. MCDOWELL
McDowell v. Chase JP Morgan Bank et al
as 1:2013cv01223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDowell
Defendant:
Chase JP Morgan Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv01069
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross, Joe Tucker, Bobby Cooks and others
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Pat Quinn, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDowell
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Sheriff, Cermak Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Robin R McDowell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Philip McDowell v. Anita Alvarez, et al
as 12-3134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP MCDOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANITA ALVAREZ, VILLAGE OF ALSIP, Village of Alsip, Illinois and COOK COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
