Cases 111 - 120 of 275
HENDRICK v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2015cv00045
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaub v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03086
Plaintiff:
Sandra Shaub
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland Inc and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Chaban v. William et al
as 1:2015cv01926
Defendant:
William, Jane & John Does 1-5, Nicholas Lamb and others
Plaintiff:
Chaban and William Chaban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. County of Kankakee et al
as 2:2015cv02048
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
County of Kankakee, Timothy E Bukowski, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tang Ricon v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv07903
Plaintiff:
Joe K Tang Ricon
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Hinsdale Township High School District 86 et al
as 1:2014cv04441
Plaintiff:
Keith Bell
Defendant:
Hinsdale Township High School District 86, Noah Lawrence and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Williams, Quentrell v. Haines, Tim et al
as 3:2014cv00312
Plaintiff:
Quentrell E. Williams
Defendant:
Tim Haines , Keith Wiegel , T. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez Rodriguez v. Hogan et al
as 1:2014cv01435
Plaintiff:
Belia Martinez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hogan, Nathan McVicker, Scott Wobbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
