Cases 131 - 140 of 275
JENNINGS v. VILASCA et al
as 1:2014cv00498
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and TOM VILASCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROWE v. VANWORMER
as 3:2014cv00032
Petitioner:
DAVID CROWE
Respondent:
TOM VANWORMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Misch et al v. Southwind Building Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Dave Misch , Tom Fistrovich , Clara Murphy and others
Defendant:
Southwind Building Group Inc and B Paul Golden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ELKIN et al v. TOM ROUSH, INC.
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
MIKE ELKIN and RUSTINA ELKIN
Defendant:
TOM ROUSH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Moreno-Avalos v. Hammond Indiana City Hall of et al
as 2:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Sonia Moreno-Avalos
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana City Hall of , Kurt Koch , Kim Nordhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petit v. Sisson et al
as 1:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Stacy E Petit
Defendant:
Tom Sisson, Shawn McGuire and Marion Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. FRANCUM et al
as 1:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
TYLER FERRELL
Defendant:
TOM FRANCUM, SGT. J. SERVIZZI and C/O SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Marshall County Superior Court et al
as 3:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Dale Manzell McDonald
Defendant:
Marshall County Superior Court, J Jeffrey Merryman, Jr, Curtis D Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. CITY OF MUNICE et al
as 1:2013cv01667
Plaintiff:
JOSH BAKER
Defendant:
CITY OF MUNICE, GEORGE HOPPER, TOM PULLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
