Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04866
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02643
Plaintiff:
Gregory Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Hillard
as 1:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Steven Holcomb
Defendant:
Sgt. Noah Hillard #9794 and Noah Hillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Clifford Roberts
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN, ADEEB OMAR ASAMA LAIDEN and ADEEB OMAR OSAMA LAIDEN
Defendant:
DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Giles v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04798
Plaintiff:
Marc Giles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hillard v. Brightfarms, Inc
as 1:2021cv03962
Plaintiff:
Lori Hillard
Defendant:
Brightfarms, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
