Cases 11 - 20 of 636
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Deven Deschepper
as 24-1483
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEVEN LUCAS DESCHEPPER
Marks v. Kaiser et al
as 3:2024cv50118
Plaintiff:
Willie Roy Marks
Defendant:
Detective Brad Kaiser, Deputy Benjamin Valdivieso and Sergeant Lucas Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Johnson v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LUCAS MAUE, C/O, Menard CC, TERRANCE JACKSON, C/O, Menard CC, GARRETT GRIFFIN, C/O, Menard CC and others
Ross v. Desroches et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Pascal Desroches, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company and Affiliates, BNY Mellon Trust Compny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ross v. Maestri
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Luca Maestri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Marcus Shoenthal v. City of Seymour, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SHOENTHAL
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, BRYANT LUCAS, Chief in his individual and official capacity, GREG O'BRIEN, Assistant Chief in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
