Cases 11 - 20 of 94
McDaniel v. Milwaukee County Jail
as 2:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Ambrose McDaniel, Sr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sample, Ambrose v. Marske, Matthew
as 3:2021cv00445
Petitioner:
Ambrose J. Sample, II
Respondent:
Matthew Marske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spires v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01051
Petitioner:
Ambrose Rayshawn Spires
Respondent:
United States of America and Frederick Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gavin v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04342
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Wendy Ambrose Gavin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McClenon et al v. Postmates Inc.
as 1:2019cv06415
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Petitioner:
Adrian Aponte, Antonio Cordova, Alejandra Monsalve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Schaive et al v. Rauner et al
as 3:2018cv03194
Plaintiff:
MELISSA SCHAIVE, MASON McDANIEL, ISAURO RIVAS and others
Defendant:
BRUCE RAUNER, RANDALL BLACKENHORN and MATT MAGALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Rogers v. Ambrose et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Karla Linett Rogers
Defendant:
Martha Ambrose, April Walton, Aarp Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Rezutko et al
as 3:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Keith Cooper
Defendant:
Steve Rezutko , Steven Ambrose , Edward Windbigler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
