Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Karen Doswell v. Maxim Staffing Solutions, et al
as 16-3708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN DOSWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXIM STAFFING SOLUTIONS and CW LLC, doing business as TANGLEWOOD TRACE
Karen Doswell v. Maxim Staffing Solutions, et al
as 16-3403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN DOSWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXIM STAFFING SOLUTIONS and CW LLC, doing business as TANGLEWOOD TRACE
KETTENBURG v. PRESIDENT et al
as 1:2015cv00122
Defendant:
CW INDIANAPOLIS, PRESIDENT and WISH-TV CHANNEL 8
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KETTENBURG
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CW, et al v. Textron, Inc.
as 14-3448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CW, by Guardians and next friends ADELE A. WOOD and JASON A. WOOD and EW, by Guardians and next friends ADELE A. WOOD and JASON A. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXTRON, INC.
Duncan v. CW Collection Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv05895
Plaintiff:
Darryln Duncan
Defendant:
CW Collection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilkins v. Psychatrist-NRC Stateville C.C. et al
as 3:2011cv50180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins
Defendant:
Psychatrist-NRC Stateville C.C., Intake Nurse-NRC Stateville, J. O'brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Specialty Finance Group LLC v. DOC Milwaukee LP et al
as 2:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
Specialty Finance Group LLC
Defendant:
DOC Milwaukee LP, Seth E Dizard, Uihlein Electric Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CW et al v. Textron Inc
as 3:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
CW and EW
Defendant:
Textron Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
One CW LLC v. Cartridge World Midwest, LLC
as 1:2008cv06050
Petitioner:
One CW LLC and One CW LLC
Respondent:
Cartridge World Midwest, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
