Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Smith v. Lucas et al
as 1:2018cv06578
Plaintiff:
Victoria Smith
Defendant:
William Lucas, Fred H. Smith LLC, Diana Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv02019
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE H SMITH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11855
Plaintiff:
George H. Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company
as 1:2015cv05820
Defendant:
Fifth Third Mortgage Company, Donald Haddaway, Michael Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Cantrell and Christopher H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeffery Haynes v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Illinois, ED H. SMITH and MORT LEVY
Smith v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2013cv00176
Petitioner:
Gregory H Smith
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Smith v. Ronald Schaffer, et al
as 12-2995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. SCHAFFER, SYLVIA MAHONE, Medical Director, GUY PIERCE and others
Haynes v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Haynes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ed H Smith and Mort Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bishop v. Clay et al
as 1:2012cv02454
Plaintiff:
Marlos Bishop
Defendant:
Dante M. Clay, Terry H. Smith, Daniel E. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
