Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Houser v. State of Illinois
as 3:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
Zebadiah R. Houser
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSER v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01283
Defendant:
RONALD BAKER, SYLVIA BOLING, FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
EMMA L. HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gully, Jr. v. Goins et al
as 3:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully, Jr.
Defendant:
Russel Goines, Derek Hundley and C/O Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves, Ind. Administrator v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Angelica Nieves
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Lowell Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Property-Owners Insurance Company v. Hilty et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Property-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Noah Hilty , Hilty Construction , Richard Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houser v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02936
Plaintiff:
Randall Houser
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houser v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al
as 3:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Patrick Houser
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company and CCI Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Houser v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tanya Houser
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Font et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Adell Font , Alexander Fuentes , Steven Gall and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
