Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Molina v. Latronico et al
as 1:2018cv06632
Plaintiff:
Michele M Molina
Defendant:
ISP Trooper Glenn Latronico, Eric David and Glenn Latronico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ZANTECKY et al
as 1:2018cv02443
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER, PENNY EDEN, ISP and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBEE v. WARDEN -- ISP
as 1:2018cv02060
Respondent:
WARDEN -- ISP
Petitioner:
DAVID BARBEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Defendant:
Capt Easton, Indiana State Prison, Cynthia Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Freemon Jordan, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. BARGE, ET AL
as 1:2018cv01943
Defendant:
BARGE, PENDLETON C F and K SEROUR
Miscellaneou:
ISP (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN H LEE, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DODD v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DODD
Miscellaneou:
ISP (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
OFFICER MACK, SERGANT MARTIN, OFFICER MCKENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner Bey v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Akeem Turner Bey
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Indiana Department of Correction, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRINSTEAD v. WARDEN -- ISP
as 1:2018cv00169
Petitioner:
JERRY RAY GRINSTEAD
Miscellaneou:
ISP (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN -- ISP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 1:2017cv03704
Respondent:
ISP, STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
ROBERT MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Allen v. Robert Omstead, et al
as 16-2986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK D. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT OMSTEAD, ISP, CHRISTOPHER RYAN DAVIS, ISP, RUSTY SLATER, ISP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
