Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Van Dyke v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 1:2022cv06063
Plaintiff:
Christel Van Dyke
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. d/b/a Chase Bank, a national banking association, Chase Home Finance L.L.C., Cyprexx Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2022cv05304
Plaintiff:
Shirley Thomas
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gehrking, Robert et al v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Robert R Gehrking, Robert R. Gehrking and Gehrking Family Revocable Living Trust
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Laurent Miller v. LionsGate et al
as 1:2022cv03308
Plaintiff:
Helene Tonique Laurent Miller
Defendant:
LionsGate, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Pharma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
PETITT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA et al
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Anita Petitt
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND and CBRE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Azoulay v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv05667
Plaintiff:
Avi Azoulay
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
