Cases 11 - 20 of 1,384
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Warden Kimberly, Christel Crow, Placement Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Naperville, Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv04196
Plaintiff:
Amara Harris
Defendant:
City of Naperville, Illinois, Juan Leon and Jonathan W Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner:
Juan Ortiz
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covington v. Castelan
as 2:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Lucas M Covington
Defendant:
Juan Omar Castelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changde Juhetai Craft Gift Limited, Dongguan Art Kitchenware Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Domingo Francisco-Juan
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOMINGO FRANCISCO-JUAN
USA v. Domingo Francisco-Juan
as 24-1595
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOMINGO FRANCISCO-JUAN
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
