Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Adams v. West Lafayette Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Richard S Trail, Melvin C Mansfield, Detective R Dembkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowell v. Sexton et al
as 2:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Sexton, Meluch, Lafayette Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lamont Dowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWELL v. SEXTON et al
as 1:2018cv03535
Defendant:
SEXTON, MELUCH, LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK LAMONT DOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Myers v. Stason Wiete, et al
as 16-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON T. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STASON L. WIETE, WEST LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES S. KIRSCH and others
Moton v. Lafayette Police Department
as 3:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Alastair Dominic Moton
Defendant:
Lafayette Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Myers v. Stason Wiete, et al
as 16-1939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON T. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STASON L. WIETE, WEST LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES S. KIRSCH and others
Moton v. West Lafayette Police Department
as 3:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Alastair Dominic Moton
Defendant:
West Lafayette Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Vander Plaats v. City of LaFayette, Indiana, et al
as 15-3342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY VANDER PLAATS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, INDIANA, LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES WILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacity and others
Myers v. Wiete et al
as 4:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jason Tye Myers
Defendant:
Stason L Wiete, West Lafayette Police Department, James S Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Rangel v. Crystal Sanders, et al
as 14-2645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN G. RANGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTAL SANDERS, JOHN DOE, at Lafayette Police Department, CHIEF OF POLICE, Lafayette Indiana Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
