Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brose Gainsville, Incorporated v. JMS Plastics, Incorporated, et al
as 11-2306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROSE GAINSVILLE, INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JMS PLASTICS, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation, JMS ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation, DAVID M. MARTINEZ, individually and others
Bell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bell
Defendant:
Andrew J Morgan , Wendell E Wright , R.M. Crotty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv06666
Plaintiff:
Ronald Harris
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Salvador Godinez, Chester Plexico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ruth M Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv04249
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, S. Godinez and M. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv04174
Plaintiff:
Vashaun Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, M. Martinez and Janis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Miller
as 2:2009cv00871
Petitioner:
Chad M Martinez
Respondent:
Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brose Gainesville Inc
as 3:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brose Gainesville Inc
Defendant:
JMS Plastics Inc, JMS Engineering Inc, David M Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jackson v. Martinez et al
as 1:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jackson
Defendant:
I. Martinez, M Martinez, Sgt. Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
